Title
Academic Economists Behaving Badly? A Survey On Three Areas Of Unethical Behavior
Abstract
This article measures the degree to which academic economists have engaged in unethical behavior and the degree to which academic economists believe the profession as a whole engages in unethical behavior. Three main types of unethical behavior are examined: (1) falsification of research; (2) expropriation of graduate student research or including an undeserving co-author on a research paper; and (3) exchange of grades for gifts, money, or sex. Using a unique data set gathered at the 1998 American Economic Association (AEA) meetings, we find that there is a significant amount of misconduct, particularly in the second category. (JEL A11, A13).
Publication Date
1-1-2001
Publication Title
Economic Inquiry
Volume
39
Issue
1
Number of Pages
162-170
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/39.1.162
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
0035586907 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/0035586907
STARS Citation
List, John A.; Bailey, Charles D.; and Euzent, Patricia J., "Academic Economists Behaving Badly? A Survey On Three Areas Of Unethical Behavior" (2001). Scopus Export 2000s. 471.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/471