Title

I Respectfully Dissent: Consensus, Agendas, And Policymaking On The U.S. Supreme Court, 1888-1999

Abstract

Scholars have been intrigued by the abrupt change in the rate of nonconsensual opinions that the Supreme Court has published over time, which substantially increased beginning with the battles cancerning the court's New Deal transition in the 1930s. Notwithstanding, none of the prior studies on this topic has made any link, whether theoretical or empirical, between the Supreme Court's issuance of these special opinions and the justices' policy preferences. We utilize fractional cointegration to examine the relationship between consensus, agendas, and decisionmaking on the Supreme Court. We find that there is a systematic interrelation between the justices' policy preferences and their issuance of nonconsensual opinions that is dependent upon the policy agenda before the court. In turn, this connection influences the court's policy outcomes, demonstrating that the justices' behavior regarding nonconsensual opinion writing is a classic example of judicial policymaking. © 2004 by The Policy Studies Association. All rights reserved.

Publication Date

1-1-2004

Publication Title

Review of Policy Research

Volume

21

Issue

3

Number of Pages

429-445

Document Type

Article

Personal Identifier

scopus

DOI Link

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00085.x

Socpus ID

2542610724 (Scopus)

Source API URL

https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/2542610724

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS