Title
Are We Getting Fooled Again? Coming To Terms With Limitations In The Use Of Personality Tests For Personnel Selection
Abstract
We recently published an article in which we highlighted a number of issues associated with the use of self-report personality tests in personnel selection contexts (Morgeson et al., 2007). Both Ones, Dilchert, Viswesvaran, and Judge (2007) and Tett and Christiansen (2007) have written responses to this article. In our response to these articles we address many of the issues raised by Ones et al. and Tett and Christiansen. In addition to a detailed response, we make the following 4 key points: (1) Our criticisms of personality testing apply only to the selection context, not to all research on personality; (2) the observed validities of personality tests predicting job performance criteria are low and have not changed much over time; (3) when evaluating the usefulness of using personality tests to select applicants, one must not ignore the observed, uncorrected validity; and (4) when discussing the value of personality tests for selection contexts, the most important criteria are those that reflect job performance. Implications for personality testing research and practice are discussed. © 2007 BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC.
Publication Date
12-1-2007
Publication Title
Personnel Psychology
Volume
60
Issue
4
Number of Pages
1029-1049
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00100.x
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
36148959012 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/36148959012
STARS Citation
Morgeson, Frederick P.; Campion, Michael A.; Dipboye, Robert L.; Hollenbeck, John R.; and Murphy, Kevin, "Are We Getting Fooled Again? Coming To Terms With Limitations In The Use Of Personality Tests For Personnel Selection" (2007). Scopus Export 2000s. 5864.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/5864