Title
Anthropomorphism Of Textured "Faces"
Abstract
Participants rated machine "faces" which varied in terms of facial feature shape, face shape, and eight facial background textures. Ratings were made for aggression, friendliness, intelligence, trustworthiness, and degree of animation. In addition, reaction time was collected for all ratings. Rough metal and blank facial backgrounds were perceived most trustworthy. Rough metal also had the highest mean friendliness. However, across ratings, face shape and feature shape proved to have more predictive validity than did the materials making up the face. It is likely that when faced with ambiguous objects, such as the front of a novel military vehicle, people project anthropomorphic features and then make judgments accordingly.
Publication Date
12-1-2006
Publication Title
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Number of Pages
1932-1935
Document Type
Article; Proceedings Paper
Personal Identifier
scopus
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
44349149440 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/44349149440
STARS Citation
Barber, Daniel; Sims, Valerie K.; Chin, Matthew G.; Velie, Matthew; and Sushil, David J., "Anthropomorphism Of Textured "Faces"" (2006). Scopus Export 2000s. 7656.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/7656