Title
Do Classroom Experiments Increase Learning In Introductory Microeconomics?
Keywords
Experiments; Incentives
Abstract
Interest in using classroom experiments to teach economics is increasing whereas empirical evidence on how experiments affect learning is limited and mixed. The author used a pretest-posttest control-group design to test whether classroom experiments and grade incentives that reward performance in experiments affect learning of introductory microeconomics. The author measured the partial effects of experiments independently of instructor quality and teaching methods using Test of Understanding in College Economics scores. Experiments without incentives are associated with higher posttest scores and greater improvement over pretest scores, but grade incentives may offset benefits of experiments. Controlling for student aptitude and other characteristics, limiting influence of potential outliers, or adjusting for potential selection bias from incomplete observation of test scores does not alter the conclusion that experiments increase learning whereas grade incentives do not. Copyright © 2006 Heldref Publications.
Publication Date
6-1-2006
Publication Title
Journal of Economic Education
Volume
37
Issue
3
Number of Pages
267-288
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.37.3.267-288
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
33748325707 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/33748325707
STARS Citation
Dickie, Mark, "Do Classroom Experiments Increase Learning In Introductory Microeconomics?" (2006). Scopus Export 2000s. 8327.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/8327