Title
The Value Of The Specialist: Empirical Evidence From The Cboe
Keywords
Bid-ask spreads; Competition; Market makers; Options; Specialists
Abstract
Using intraday options data, this paper analyzes the "natural experiment" of the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) superimposing a specialist system on an existing multiple market maker system during 1999. We find support for the demand uncertainty literature which states that specialists are better able to resolve uncertainty about investor preferences. In particular, we find that quoted, current, and effective spreads decrease following the specialist system adoption. This translates into a $221 million annual savings for investors. We further find that following the switch, the market share of the CBOE increases significantly, suggesting that specialists use spreads to attract order flow. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Publication Date
5-1-2006
Publication Title
Journal of Financial Markets
Volume
9
Issue
2
Number of Pages
100-118
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2005.12.002
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
33646086723 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/33646086723
STARS Citation
Anand, Amber and Weaver, Daniel G., "The Value Of The Specialist: Empirical Evidence From The Cboe" (2006). Scopus Export 2000s. 8407.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/8407