Title
Tale Of Two Context-Based Formalisms For Representing Human Knowledge
Abstract
This paper describes an investigation that compared and contrasted Context-based Reasoning (CxBR) and Contextual Graphs (CxG), two paradigms used to represent human intelligence. The specific objectives were to increase understanding of both paradigms, identifying which, if either, excels at a particular function, and to look for potential synergism amongst them. We study these paradigms through ten different aspects, with some indication of which one excels at this particular facet of performance. We point out how they are complementary and finishes with a recommendation for a new synergistic approach, followed by an example of an application of the new approach to tactical © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.
Publication Date
1-1-2006
Publication Title
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume
4031 LNAI
Number of Pages
137-145
Document Type
Article; Proceedings Paper
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1007/11779568_17
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
33746215708 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/33746215708
STARS Citation
Brézillon, Patrick and Gonzalez, Avelino J., "Tale Of Two Context-Based Formalisms For Representing Human Knowledge" (2006). Scopus Export 2000s. 9149.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/9149