Title
Are Minimal Representations Still Representations?
Keywords
Action; Action oriented representation; Decoupleability; Dynamic systems; Pre-intentional act
Abstract
I examine the following question: Do actions require representations that are intrinsic to the action itself? Recent work by Mark Rowlands, Michael Wheeler, and Andy Clark suggests that actions may require a minimal form of representation. I argue that the various concepts of minimal representation on offer do not apply to action per se and that a non-representationalist account that focuses on dynamic systems of self-organizing continuous reciprocal causation at the sub-personal level is superior. I further recommend a scientific pragmatism regarding the concept of representation.
Publication Date
12-1-2008
Publication Title
International Journal of Philosophical Studies
Volume
16
Issue
3
Number of Pages
351-369
Document Type
Article; Proceedings Paper
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550802113243
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
57749131318 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/57749131318
STARS Citation
Gallagher, Shaun, "Are Minimal Representations Still Representations?" (2008). Scopus Export 2000s. 9770.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/9770