Title
Physical Attractiveness Biases In Ratings Of Employment Suitability: Tracking Down The "Beauty Is Beastly" Effect
Abstract
The "what is beautiful is good" heuristic suggests that physically attractive persons benefit from their attractiveness in a large range of situations, including perceptions of employment suitability. Conversely, the "beauty is beastly" effect suggests that attractiveness can be detrimental to women in certain employment contexts, although these findings have been less consistent than those for the "what is beautiful is good" effect. The current research seeks to uncover situations in which beauty might be detrimental for female applicants. In two studies, we found that attractiveness can be detrimental for women applying for masculine sex-typed jobs for which physical appearance is perceived as unimportant. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Publication Date
4-1-2010
Publication Title
Journal of Social Psychology
Volume
150
Issue
3
Number of Pages
301-318
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903365414
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
77953846459 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/77953846459
STARS Citation
Johnson, Stefanie; Podratz, Kenneth; Dipboye, Robert; and Gibbons, Ellie, "Physical Attractiveness Biases In Ratings Of Employment Suitability: Tracking Down The "Beauty Is Beastly" Effect" (2010). Scopus Export 2010-2014. 1343.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2010/1343