Title
Testing The Suitability Of Mediation Of Child Support Orders In Title Iv-D Cases
Keywords
Child welfare; Policy evaluation; Unemployment
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to test mediation versus a traditional court process for the establishment or modification of child support orders. The intention is to determine which dispute resolution process is associated with greater client satisfaction and compliance. An auxiliary objective is to test the type of cases which are most successfully mediated. Results: The analyses suggest that client satisfaction is greater with mediation, but there is no corresponding increase in compliance. Regarding the type of cases where mediation was most fruitful, the research finds that voluntary mediation and mediator experience are both positively associated with more successful mediation. Conclusions: There is no evidence that mediation will necessarily lead to increased compliance with child support orders. © The Author(s) 2010.
Publication Date
3-1-2010
Publication Title
Research on Social Work Practice
Volume
20
Issue
2
Number of Pages
212-222
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509339029
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
77649288084 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/77649288084
STARS Citation
Schraufnagel, Scot and Li, Quan, "Testing The Suitability Of Mediation Of Child Support Orders In Title Iv-D Cases" (2010). Scopus Export 2010-2014. 1535.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2010/1535