Title
Public Opinion On The Harshness Of Local Courts: An Experimental Test Of Question Wording Effects
Keywords
court; courts/law; other; quantitative methods
Abstract
Drawing on framing theory, the present study tests the impact of question wording on people's reported opinions about the harshness of their local courts. A randomized experimental design tested two salient variations against the standard wording used in the National Opinion Research Center's General Social Survey (GSS). The results indicated statistically significant differences, with fewer respondents expressing a desire for greater harshness with the alternative forms than the standard question form. Four of the five correlates that the authors examined also showed differential relationships with punitiveness among the question forms. These findings suggest that scholars should carefully consider the meaning of people's responses when interpreting the GSS question as an indicator of public punitiveness. © 2011 Georgia State University.
Publication Date
12-1-2011
Publication Title
Criminal Justice Review
Volume
36
Issue
4
Number of Pages
487-497
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016811418822
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84855410635 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84855410635
STARS Citation
Applegate, Brandon K. and Sanborn, Joseph B., "Public Opinion On The Harshness Of Local Courts: An Experimental Test Of Question Wording Effects" (2011). Scopus Export 2010-2014. 2360.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2010/2360