Title
Comparing Assessment Methods As Predictors Of Student Learning In An Undergraduate Mathematics Course
Keywords
Assessment; Continuous assessment; Cumulative assessment; Mathematics; Projects; Student learning
Abstract
This experiment was designed to determine which assessment method: continuous assessment (in the form of daily in-class quizzes), cumulative assessment (in the form of online homework), or project-based learning, best predicted student learning (dependent upon post-test grades) in an undergraduate mathematics course. Participants included 117 university-level undergraduate freshmen enrolled in a course titled ‘Mathematics for Calculus’. A stepwise regression model was formulated to model the relationship between the predictor variables (the continuous assessment, cumulative assessment, and project scores) versus the outcome variable (the post-test scores). Results indicated that ultimately the continuous assessment scores best predicted students’ post-test scores. © 2011 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Publication Date
1-1-2011
Publication Title
International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology
Volume
42
Issue
8
Number of Pages
1061-1067
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2010.550946
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84857838126 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84857838126
STARS Citation
Shorter, Nichole A. and Young, Cynthia Y., "Comparing Assessment Methods As Predictors Of Student Learning In An Undergraduate Mathematics Course" (2011). Scopus Export 2010-2014. 3236.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2010/3236