Title

The Importance Of Contextual Variables When Judging Fairness: An Examination Of Counterfactual Thoughts And Fairness Theory

Keywords

Counterfactual thinking; Fairness perceptions; Organizational justice

Abstract

This research empirically examines the underlying mechanisms of fairness theory (Folger & Cropanzano, 1998, 2001), namely counterfactual thought processes. Study 1 used a policy-capturing design to examine the relative importance of contextual variables in predicting counterfactual thoughts and fairness perceptions. Study 2 utilized a between-subjects design and asked participants to generate their own counterfactuals in response to an unfortunate event. Results of both studies showed that fairness perceptions are influenced by contextual variables (i.e., outcome severity, target knowledge and expertise, sin of commission vs. omission) and counterfactual thinking. Counterfactual thoughts partially mediated the effects of contextual variables and fairness perceptions in Study 1. Exploratory analyses from Study 3 revealed that the measurement of counterfactual thoughts (frequency vs. strength) may capture different underlying constructs. Implications are discussed. © 2010 Elsevier Inc.

Publication Date

3-1-2011

Publication Title

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volume

114

Issue

2

Number of Pages

127-141

Document Type

Article

Personal Identifier

scopus

DOI Link

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.10.007

Socpus ID

78651501214 (Scopus)

Source API URL

https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/78651501214

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS