Title
Content, Social, And Metacognitive Statements: An Empirical Study Comparing Human-Human And Human-Computer Tutorial Dialogue
Abstract
We present a study which compares human-human computer-mediated tutoring with two computer tutoring systems based on the same materials but differing in the type of feedback they provide. Our results show that there are significant differences in interaction style between human-human and human-computer tutoring, as well as between the two computer tutors, and that different dialogue characteristics predict learning gain in different conditions. We show that there are significant differences in the non-content statements that students make to human and computer tutors, but also to different types of computer tutors. These differences also affect which factors are correlated with learning gain and user satisfaction. We argue that ITS designers should pay particular attention to strategies for dealing with negative social and metacognitive statements, and also conduct further research on how interaction style affects human-computer tutoring. © 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Publication Date
11-8-2010
Publication Title
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume
6383 LNCS
Number of Pages
93-108
Document Type
Article; Proceedings Paper
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16020-2_7
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
78049363690 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/78049363690
STARS Citation
Dzikovska, Myroslava O.; Steinhauser, Natalie B.; Moore, Johanna D.; Campbell, Gwendolyn E.; and Harrison, Katherine M., "Content, Social, And Metacognitive Statements: An Empirical Study Comparing Human-Human And Human-Computer Tutorial Dialogue" (2010). Scopus Export 2010-2014. 576.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2010/576