Title
Dissensual Decision Making: Revisiting The Demise Of Consensual Norms Within The U.S. Supreme Court
Keywords
agenda; concurrence; dissent; Judiciary Act of 1925; norm of consensus; Supreme Court
Abstract
This analysis seeks to understand the decline of Supreme Court consensual norms often attributed to the failed leadership of Chief Justice Stone. A new unit of analysis-justice-level dissent and concurrence rates-supports an alternative view of observed increases in dissensual decision making. When these measures are estimated with time-series techniques, results offer evidence of multiple changepoints in this norm of the Court that both lead and lag Stone's elevation. Broader contextual explanations related to the alteration of the Court's discretionary issue agenda and its ideological and demographic composition also contribute to fractures in the once-unanimous voting coalitions. © 2012 University of Utah.
Publication Date
6-1-2013
Publication Title
Political Research Quarterly
Volume
66
Issue
2
Number of Pages
467-481
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912912436880
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84876956688 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84876956688
STARS Citation
Hendershot, Marcus E.; Hurwitz, Mark S.; Lanier, Drew Noble; and Pacelle, Richard L., "Dissensual Decision Making: Revisiting The Demise Of Consensual Norms Within The U.S. Supreme Court" (2013). Scopus Export 2010-2014. 7070.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2010/7070