Title
Blended Learning: A Dangerous Idea?
Keywords
Blended learning; Institutional support; Student agency; Student rating of instruction; Student success
Abstract
The authors make the case that implementation of a successful blended learning program requires alignment of institutional, faculty, and student goals. Reliable and robust infrastructure must be in place to support students and faculty. Continuous evaluation can effectively track the impact of blended learning on students, faculty, and the institution. These data are used to inform stakeholders and impact policy to improve faculty development and other support structures necessary for success. This iterative loop of continuous quality improvement is augmented by faculty scholarship of teaching and learning research. The evolution of blended learning at the University of Central Florida is used as a model and research collected over sixteen years illustrates that with proper support and planning, blended learning can result in positive institutional transformation.
Publication Date
7-1-2013
Publication Title
Internet and Higher Education
Volume
18
Number of Pages
15-23
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.001
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84872059102 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84872059102
STARS Citation
Moskal, Patsy; Dziuban, Charles; and Hartman, Joel, "Blended Learning: A Dangerous Idea?" (2013). Scopus Export 2010-2014. 7144.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2010/7144