Title
Preserving The Right To A Fair Trial: An Examination Of Prejudicial Value Of Visual And Auditory Evidence
Abstract
The present study empirically investigated the impact of auditory and visual evidence on juror emotional state and decisions. In a 3 (Graphic Images / Neutral Images / No Images) × 2 (Auditory Absent / Auditory Present) × 2 (Standard Jury Instructions / Revised Instructions) between-subjects factorial design, 532 participants reviewed a murder case and rendered verdict decisions. Changes in emotional state after presentation of evidence were collected using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Expanded Form (PANAS-X; Watson & Clark, 1994). Despite earlier assertions of a mediational relationship between evidence presentation mode, juror emotional response, and verdict, results of the present study suggest some modes of evidence presentation (namely, graphic visual evidence) influence conviction rates independent of emotional responses. The inclusion of verbiage regarding emotionality within general jury instructions appeared insufficient to limit emotional responses to evidence. © NAJP.
Publication Date
1-1-2014
Publication Title
North American Journal of Psychology
Volume
16
Issue
2
Number of Pages
397-414
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84901373681 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84901373681
STARS Citation
Edwards, Emily R. and Mottarella, Karen E., "Preserving The Right To A Fair Trial: An Examination Of Prejudicial Value Of Visual And Auditory Evidence" (2014). Scopus Export 2010-2014. 9765.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2010/9765