Narcissistic Rhetoric And Crowdfunding Performance: A Social Role Theory Perspective
Keywords
Content analysis; Crowdfunding; Narcissism; Social role theory
Abstract
Drawing from clinical and organizational narcissism research, we develop a novel measure of narcissistic rhetoric, investigating its prevalence in a sample of 1863 crowdfunding campaigns. An experiment using 1800 observations further validates our measure and confirms our hypothesized inverted-U relationship between narcissistic rhetoric and crowdfunding performance. Leveraging social role theory, we explore sex, sexual orientation, and race as potential moderators of this relationship. Moderation tests reveal LGBTQ entrepreneurs generally yield greater performance when using narcissistic rhetoric than heterosexuals while racial minorities underperform Caucasians using narcissistic rhetoric. Our findings suggest successful crowdfunding campaigns must balance narcissistic rhetoric with entrepreneurs’ perceived social roles.
Publication Date
11-1-2018
Publication Title
Journal of Business Venturing
Volume
33
Issue
6
Number of Pages
780-812
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.004
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
85046115963 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85046115963
STARS Citation
Anglin, Aaron H.; Wolfe, Marcus T.; Short, Jeremy C.; McKenny, Aaron F.; and Pidduck, Robert J., "Narcissistic Rhetoric And Crowdfunding Performance: A Social Role Theory Perspective" (2018). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 10323.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/10323