Fidelity &Amp; Validity In Robotic Simulation
Keywords
Human-Robot Interaction; Simulation Validation; Trust
Abstract
This work assesses the relationship between common theoretical constructs involved in simulation design and evaluation. Specifically, the degree to which realism is a desired goal in design is examined through a thorough review of the available literature. It was found that, especially for training simulations, high fidelity does not always beget improved outcomes, and this finding was corroborated by the results of an experiment involving a simulated robot. In the within-subjects experiment, participants rated their trust in both live and simulated versions of a robot performing in both reliable and unreliable scenarios. As predicted, strong correlations in both the reliable and unreliable scenarios validate the RIVET simulation engine as a model for trust in HRI and provide further evidence that relatively low-fidelity simulations can sometimes be sufficient or superior to high-fidelity alternatives.
Publication Date
5-14-2015
Publication Title
2015 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision, CogSIMA 2015
Number of Pages
113-117
Document Type
Article; Proceedings Paper
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1109/COGSIMA.2015.7108184
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84934324501 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84934324501
STARS Citation
Schafer, K. Elizabeth; Sanders, Tracy; Kessler, Theresa T.; Dunfee, Mitchell; and Wild, Tyler, "Fidelity &Amp; Validity In Robotic Simulation" (2015). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 1752.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/1752