Auditor Independence In Fact: Research, Regulatory, And Practice Implications Drawn From Experimental And Archival Research
Keywords
Auditor independence; Independence in fact; Independence regulation
Abstract
Notwithstanding various safeguards intended to enhance auditor independence in fact, regulators including the PCAOB have continued to express concerns that auditors, at times, are failing to maintain an appropriate level of independence. In this paper, we provide an analysis of selected academic studies related to auditor independence to offer readers a foundation on which to evaluate the substantial body of research in the area and to understand the mixed findings reported in experimental and archival studies. We discuss issues surrounding the research designs and methods used in prior work, highlighting challenges that face researchers. Subsequently, we take stock of what we have learned from our analysis and consider the research, regulatory, and practice implications of our conclusions. We also offer avenues for future research and highlight specific issues that warrant further investigation.
Publication Date
3-1-2015
Publication Title
Accounting Horizons
Volume
29
Issue
1
Number of Pages
217-238
Document Type
Note
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50966
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84943562433 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84943562433
STARS Citation
Church, Bryan K.; Jenkins, J. Gregory; McCracken, Susan A.; Roush, Pamela B.; and Stanley, Jonathan D., "Auditor Independence In Fact: Research, Regulatory, And Practice Implications Drawn From Experimental And Archival Research" (2015). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 2143.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/2143