Are More Choices Better? An Experimental Investigation Of The Effects Of Multiple Tax Incentives
Keywords
Choice complexity; Tax incentives; Tax policy
Abstract
The U.S. federal income tax system includes numerous incentives intended to encourage many behaviors. However, these incentives add complexity. This study investigates how one source of complexity, the number of different incentives, affects individuals’ use of tax incentives. The results from two experiments detect no evidence that having more (versus fewer) incentive choices (i.e., high choice complexity) affects individuals’ decisions to engage in the targeted behavior or select an incentive. However, the results do show that individuals faced with high choice complexity are more likely to make errors and less likely to choose the optimal incentive. Further, high choice complexity leads to greater perceived complexity and difficulty, which, in turn, is related to less positive emotions and more anxiety. Thus, high choice complexity has negative consequences on individuals. This study also contributes to the choice complexity literature by examining its effect on making an optimal choice.
Publication Date
9-1-2016
Publication Title
Journal of the American Taxation Association
Volume
38
Issue
2
Number of Pages
111-128
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.2308/atax-51478
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84994222996 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84994222996
STARS Citation
Bobek, Donna D.; Chen, Jason C.; Hageman, Amy M.; and Tian, Yu, "Are More Choices Better? An Experimental Investigation Of The Effects Of Multiple Tax Incentives" (2016). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 2562.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/2562