Making The Grade: Judicial Behavior In Civil Protection Order Hearings For Intimate Partner Violence
Keywords
interactional justice; judges; protection orders; Victims; violence
Abstract
In the USA, civil protection orders, commonly known as restraining orders, have been underutilized as a means of protecting victims of intimate partner violence. It has been proposed that part of the reason for this underutilization is victim apprehension over treatment by the courts. To improve the experience of accessing legal relief, Court Watch programs have been implemented in various jurisdictions across the country. Court Watch programs monitor judicial behavior on several dimensions, including whether interactions with victims are informational, explanatory, participatory, and respectful. Using secondary data obtained from a Florida Court Watch program, this study examines judicial behavior in 500 civil protection order hearings for intimate partner violence. Applying quantitative and qualitative analytic strategies, we examine Court Watch perceptions of judicial behavior, the association between Court Watch perceptions of judicial behavior and civil protection order outcomes, and factors that might account for judicial behavior.
Publication Date
9-1-2016
Publication Title
International Review of Victimology
Volume
22
Issue
3
Number of Pages
269-287
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758016630890
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84981717847 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84981717847
STARS Citation
Lucken, Karol and Rosky, Jeffrey, "Making The Grade: Judicial Behavior In Civil Protection Order Hearings For Intimate Partner Violence" (2016). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 3016.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/3016