Title

Delivering Bad News: How Procedural Unfairness Affects Messengers’ Distancing And Refusals

Keywords

Delivering bad news; Distancing behavior; Honesty predicament; Organizational justice; Refusals

Abstract

Drawing from a social predicament and identity management framework, we argue that procedural unfairness on the part of decision makers places messengers in a dilemma where they attempt to protect their professional image or legitimacy by engaging in refusals (e.g., curbing explanations) and exhibiting distancing behaviors (e.g., minimizing contact with victims) when delivering bad news. Such behaviors however, violate key tenets of fair interpersonal treatment. The results of two experiments supported our hypotheses in samples of experienced managers. Specifically, we found that levels of messengers’ distancing and refusals were greater when the procedures used by decision makers were unfair rather than fair. Additionally, messengers’ perceptions of a predicament (honesty versus disclosure) mediated these relationships. Implications and future research directions regarding the ethical delivery of bad news in the workplace are discussed.

Publication Date

6-1-2016

Publication Title

Journal of Business Ethics

Volume

136

Issue

1

Number of Pages

43-55

Document Type

Article

Personal Identifier

scopus

DOI Link

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2500-5

Socpus ID

84919363607 (Scopus)

Source API URL

https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84919363607

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS