The “Right” And The “Good” In Ethical Leadership: Implications For Supervisors’ Performance And Promotability Evaluations
Keywords
Deontology; Ethical leadership; Ethics; Leadership; Performance; Promotability; Utilitarianism
Abstract
Substantial research demonstrates that ethical leaders improve a broad range of outcomes for their employees, but considerably less attention has been devoted to the performance and success of the leaders themselves. The present study explores the extent to which being ethical relates to leaders’ performance and promotability. We address this question by examining ethical leadership from the two ethical perspectives most common in Western traditions—i.e., the “right” and the “good”—and whether one might be more closely associated than the other with performance and promotability evaluations. Results from 117 employee-supervisor-manager triads show that supervisors with a deontological outlook are more likely to be seen as ethical leaders (given current conceptualizations of the construct) and that utilitarian leaders are more likely to earn higher performance evaluations (above these current conceptions). We discuss the implications of these findings for research on ethical leadership.
Publication Date
9-1-2016
Publication Title
Journal of Business Ethics
Volume
137
Issue
4
Number of Pages
743-755
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2747-5
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
85032125413 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85032125413
STARS Citation
Letwin, Chaim; Wo, David; Folger, Robert; Rice, Darryl; and Taylor, Regina, "The “Right” And The “Good” In Ethical Leadership: Implications For Supervisors’ Performance And Promotability Evaluations" (2016). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 3566.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/3566