Rules Of Thumb For Evaluating Preferential Trading Arrangements: Evidence From Cge Assessments
Abstract
Most interesting results on the welfare effects of regional arrangements are ambiguous at a theoretical level. Many questions only have quantitative answers that are specific to the particular model and policy considered. Thus, to determine the impact of prospective regional arrangements governments often rely on a quantitative evaluation. Usually at the request of a government involved, we have implemented a number of computable general equilibrium (CGE) models to inform policy-makers. We summarize the main conclusions we draw from these studies, focusing on applications in the Americas….
Publication Date
1-1-2016
Publication Title
TRADE POLICIES FOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSITION
Number of Pages
145-153
Document Type
Article; Book Chapter
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813108448_0007
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
85116532947 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85116532947
STARS Citation
Harrison, Glenn W.; Rutherford, Thomas F.; and Tarr, David G., "Rules Of Thumb For Evaluating Preferential Trading Arrangements: Evidence From Cge Assessments" (2016). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 3782.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/3782