The Importance Of A Strong Methodology When Choosing Baselines For Physiological Assessment
Abstract
This study examines current resting baseline practices in physiological measurement. Specifically, we investigated between- and within-baseline stability of two-minute resting periods for electrocardiography (ECG), cerebral bloodflow velocity (CBFV), function near-infrared imaging (fNIR), and electroencephalography (EEG). A 4 x 4 within subjects ANOVA revealed instability between and within baselines for several psychophysiological measures. Planned comparisons between the final 30 seconds of each resting period, however, revealed that most measures return to a stabilized level after a period of attenuation. Outcomes suggest that researchers disregard the first minute and thirty seconds of resting baselines to allow for this attenuation when using a full suite of physiological measures.
Publication Date
1-1-2016
Publication Title
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Number of Pages
32-36
Document Type
Article; Proceedings Paper
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601008
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
85021820155 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85021820155
STARS Citation
Parchment, Avonie; Wohleber, Ryan; and Reinerman-Jones, Lauren, "The Importance Of A Strong Methodology When Choosing Baselines For Physiological Assessment" (2016). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 4389.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/4389