What Drives Trickle-Down Effects? A Test Of Multiple Mediation Processes
Abstract
Organizational research has established the existence of trickle-down effects, wherein the perceptions, attitudes, or behavior of one person in an organization affects those of another person at a lower level. Although current research has explained the phenomenon using several different theoretical perspectives, prior studies have not explicitly tested the theorized mechanisms. This paper develops and tests a model that incorporates three theories of trickle-down effects for interactional justice perceptions: social exchange theory, social learning theory, and displaced aggression. Using crosssectional data from 200 supervisor-subordinate dyads in Study 1 and longitudinal data from 270 supervisor-subordinate dyads in Study 2, we test this multiple mediator model. The results demonstrate that the two aspects of interactional justice perceptions- interpersonal and informational justice perceptions-trickle down fromsupervisors to subordinates through two different mechanisms. Specifically, displaced aggression accounts for the trickle-down effects of interpersonal justice perceptions and social exchange accounts for the trickle-down effects of informational justice perceptions. We discuss the implications of the findings for research on trickle-down effects and organizational justice.
Publication Date
12-1-2015
Publication Title
Academy of Management Journal
Volume
58
Issue
6
Number of Pages
1848-1868
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0670
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84975764301 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84975764301
STARS Citation
Wo, David X.H.; Ambrose, Maureen L.; and Schminke, Marshall, "What Drives Trickle-Down Effects? A Test Of Multiple Mediation Processes" (2015). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 461.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/461