Best Practices In Summative Assessment
Keywords
Blueprinting; Generalizability; Reliability; Summative assessment; Validity
Abstract
The goal of this review is to highlight key elements underpinning excellent high-stakes summative assessment. This guide is primarily aimed at faculty members with the responsibility of assigning student grades and is intended to be a practical tool to help throughout the process of planning, developing, and deploying tests as well as monitoring their effectiveness. After a brief overview of the criteria for high-quality assessment, the guide runs through best practices for aligning assessment with learning outcomes and compares common testing modalities. Next, the guide discusses the kind of validity evidence needed to support defensible grading of student performance. This review concentrates on how to measure the outcome of student learning; other reviews in this series will expand on the related concepts of formative testing and how to leverage testing for learning.
Publication Date
1-1-2017
Publication Title
Advances in Physiology Education
Volume
41
Issue
1
Number of Pages
110-119
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00116.2016
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
85013092856 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85013092856
STARS Citation
Kibble, Jonathan D., "Best Practices In Summative Assessment" (2017). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 5129.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/5129