Vulvodynia Is Not Created Equally: Empirical Classification Of Women With Vulvodynia
Keywords
Chronic vulvar pain; Classification; National Vulvodynia Registry; Patient subgroups; Pelvic pain; Vulvodynia
Abstract
Background: Vulvodynia classification is based on the sensory dimensions of pain and does not include psychological factors associated with the pain experience and treatment outcomes. Previous work has shown that individuals with chronic pain can be classified into subgroups based on pain sensitivity, psychological distress, mood, and symptom severity. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify distinct subgroups of women with vulvodynia enrolled in the National Vulvodynia Registry. We hypothesized that women with vulvodynia can be clustered into subgroups based on distress and pain sensitivity. Design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: We conducted an exploratory hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis using Ward’s cluster method and squared Euclidean distances to identify unique subgroups based on baseline psychological distress and pain sensitivity. The variables included the catastrophizing subscale of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory, the State Trait Anxiety Index-Trait scale, McGill Pain Questionnaire-Affective subscale, and vulvar and pelvic muscle pressure pain sensitivity. Subjects: Eight sites enrolled women who presented with vaginal or vulval pain of at least 3-month duration. Results: Two distinct subgroups, high pain sensitivity with high distress (n=27) and low pain sensitivity with low distress (n=100), emerged from the cluster analysis. Validation indicated that subgroups differed in terms of clinical pain intensity, sensory aspects of pain, and intercourse pain. Conclusion: Empirical classification indicates that unique subgroups exist in women with vulvodynia. Providers should be aware of the heterogeneity of this condition with respect to pain-related distress and pain sensitivity.
Publication Date
7-6-2017
Publication Title
Journal of Pain Research
Volume
10
Number of Pages
1601-1609
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S136751
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
85024847108 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85024847108
STARS Citation
Alappattu, Meryl; Lamvu, Georgine; Feranec, Jessica; Witzeman, Kathryn; and Robinson, Michael, "Vulvodynia Is Not Created Equally: Empirical Classification Of Women With Vulvodynia" (2017). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 5329.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/5329