Police Use Of Less Lethal Force: Does Administrative Policy Matter?
Keywords
continuum; discretion; police; policy; use of force
Abstract
Scholars have long theorized that constraining police officer discretion via organizational policy improves decision-making. Empirically, prior research shows that more restrictive lethal force policies result in a reduction in the number of police shootings and in racial disparity. Yet, researchers have never examined the impact of less lethal force policies in relation to the full spectrum of less lethal force tactics. In addressing this research void, we examine 3,340 use of force incidents from three US agencies, each varying in terms of policy direction and restrictiveness. The results consistently show that officers working within the most restrictive policy framework used force less readily than officers who operated within more permissive policy environments. Hence, police administrators wishing to reduce coercion should consider the potential effect that a more restrictive policy may have on such behavior.
Publication Date
2-23-2017
Publication Title
Justice Quarterly
Volume
34
Issue
2
Number of Pages
193-216
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2016.1147593
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84961216889 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84961216889
STARS Citation
Terrill, William and Paoline, Eugene A., "Police Use Of Less Lethal Force: Does Administrative Policy Matter?" (2017). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 5447.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/5447