An Examination Of The U.S. Public Accounting Profession’S Public Interest Discourse And Actions In Federal Policy Making

Keywords

Accounting; Lobbying; Politics; Professionalism

Abstract

Participation in the political process by the United States public accounting profession often blurs the role of the profession as advocates for the public interest with its role as advocates for its own private interests. In this study, we draw from prior theoretical and empirical work to investigate recent federal political activities of the public accounting profession to shed light on these sometimes contradictory roles. In particular, we investigate ten contemporary regulatory issues of interest to the AICPA. We analyze 36 AICPA legislative advocacy letters related to these issues that were provided to federal policy makers. In addition, we analyze the public accounting profession’s federal lobbying reports that were submitted during this same time period. The analysis allows us to assess the public interest discourse present in the AICPA legislative letters as well as the extent of political action taken by the profession related to these issues based on the profession’s lobbying efforts. Our analyses (1) demonstrate that the profession’s discourse and actions often reflect both public and private interest motivations, (2) allow us to categorize the profession’s advocacy efforts as arising from specific motivations, and (3) show that the profession’s public interest arguments used to advocate for their policy positions change depending upon the specific legislative issue being considered.

Publication Date

5-1-2017

Publication Title

Journal of Business Ethics

Volume

142

Issue

2

Number of Pages

203-220

Document Type

Article

Personal Identifier

scopus

DOI Link

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3158-y

Socpus ID

84964397507 (Scopus)

Source API URL

https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84964397507

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS