Multi-Period Competitive Cheap Talk With Highly Biased Experts
Keywords
Cheap talk; Competition; Multiple senders
Abstract
Each of n experts communicates with a principal about the privately observed quality of the expert's own project via cheap talk, with new independently drawn projects available each period until the principal adopts one. Even when experts are highly biased in that they only receive a positive payoff if their own project is selected, we show that informative equilibria may exist, characterize a large class of stationary equilibria, and find the Pareto dominant symmetric equilibrium. Experts face a tradeoff between inducing acceptance now versus waiting for a better project should the game continue. When the future is more highly valued experts send more informative messages, increasing the average quality of an adopted project and resulting in a Pareto improvement, while communication is harmed and payoffs can decline when there is more competition between experts.
Publication Date
3-1-2017
Publication Title
Games and Economic Behavior
Volume
102
Number of Pages
240-254
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2017.01.003
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
85009460717 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85009460717
STARS Citation
Schmidbauer, Eric, "Multi-Period Competitive Cheap Talk With Highly Biased Experts" (2017). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 5560.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/5560