To Shift Or Not To Shift? Determinants And Consequences Of Phase Shifting On Justice Judgments

Abstract

Building on fairness heuristic theory and dual-process theories of cognition, we examine individuals' perceptions of phase shifting. We define phase shifting as an individual perception that triggers a shift from type 1 to type 2 cognitive processes resulting in the reevaluation of justice judgments. In a longitudinal study of a merger, we empirically test the influence of phase-shifting perceptions on justice judgments, and we identify antecedents of phase-shifting perceptions. We find employees' perceptions of the change as a phase-shifting event moderates the relationship between overall justice judgments prior to change (time 1), and subsequent assessments of justice six months later (time 2). We study three situational antecedents (i.e., magnitude of change, managerial exemplarity, and coworker support for change) and one individual antecedent (i.e., dispositional resistance to change) of phase-shifting perceptions. The four hypothesized antecedents together predict 74% of employees' perceptions of the merger as a phase-shifting event. Implications for research and practice regarding organizational justice and organizational change are discussed.

Publication Date

4-1-2017

Publication Title

Academy of Management Journal

Volume

60

Issue

2

Number of Pages

798-817

Document Type

Article

Personal Identifier

scopus

DOI Link

https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0181

Socpus ID

85018302627 (Scopus)

Source API URL

https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85018302627

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS