Examining The Effects Of A Novel Training Paradigm For Vigilance On Mental Workload And Stress
Abstract
Vigilance research often utilizes training to prepare observers for the monotony associated with these types of tasks. Although performance benefits have been shown previously for training, little evidence exists for the subjective effects training for vigilance can impose. The goal of this study is to investigate the effects of two types of training, practice and knowledge of results (KR), on observers' perceived levels of mental workload and stress. The study makes use of the NASA-TLX and Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (DSSQ) to measure these effects. The results indicate that observers benefit subjectively from both types of training, but in potentially different manners. We discuss the differences in the effects on mental workload and stress, as well as the potential impact on training for vigilance in the future.
Publication Date
1-1-2017
Publication Title
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Volume
2017-October
Number of Pages
1504-1508
Document Type
Article; Proceedings Paper
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601861
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
85042479089 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85042479089
STARS Citation
Fraulini, Nicholas W.; Fistel, Alexa L.; Perez, Monica A.; Perez, Teresa L.; and Szalma, James L., "Examining The Effects Of A Novel Training Paradigm For Vigilance On Mental Workload And Stress" (2017). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 6992.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/6992