Perceptions Of Supervisors And Performance: A Thematic Analysis
Abstract
Observation is a common occurrence within the workplace, and can often manifest as either peer-to-peer monitoring or supervisor-to-peer monitoring. To date, there is a limited body of research that describes changes in performance due to either a positive or negative relationship between supervisors and employees. The present study reports qualitative data on supervisor-to-employee relationships and how the quality of the relationship can alter human performance. The results indicated that relationship with a supervisor was related to perceived performance under direct observation. Women were more likely to report a positive relationship with their supervisor, yet also indicated a negative emotion toward being monitored. These results are important in understanding how supervisor presence influences individual performance when completing job-specific tasks. The implications for future research are discussed.
Publication Date
1-1-2017
Publication Title
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Volume
2017-October
Number of Pages
1740-1744
Document Type
Article; Proceedings Paper
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601916
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
85042497759 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85042497759
STARS Citation
Claypoole, Victoria L.; Neigel, Alexis R.; and Szalma, James L., "Perceptions Of Supervisors And Performance: A Thematic Analysis" (2017). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 7020.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/7020