Reply To Further Defenses Of Incentivization

Keywords

collective intentionality; institutional facts; Searle; we-intentions

Abstract

In a previous article, we challenged the “incentivization view” held by J. P. Smit, Filip Buekens, and Stan du Plessis as failing to cover social phenomena involving strict joint actions. The authors’ response to our criticism seriously misstates our main point. We have therefore, as briefly and sharply as we can, restated the problem in this note.

Publication Date

12-1-2017

Publication Title

Philosophy of the Social Sciences

Volume

47

Issue

6

Number of Pages

463-471

Document Type

Note

Personal Identifier

scopus

DOI Link

https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393117727247

Socpus ID

85033240918 (Scopus)

Source API URL

https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85033240918

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS