Transnational Neo-Victorian Studies: Notes On The Possibilities And Limitations Of A Discipline
Abstract
This essay explores the field of transnational neo-Victorian studies, arguing that “transnational” does not so much signal a subcategory of the discipline of Victorian or neo-Victorian studies as it does a recalibration of one's instruments of analysis and of one's position within a vast constellation of cultural producers and consumers, both within and without the academy. Transnational neo-Victorian studies requires recognizing the value of what literary critic Juliet John has called “undisciplined knowledge.” It requires, moreover, a collaborative and tentative ethos that is often at odds with the structural realities of the academy. This essay first glosses some of the salient discussions around the terms “Victorian,” “neo-Victorian,” and “transnational” before turning to an example of a transnational neo-Victorian text, Japanese manga Kuroshitsuji (黒執事; 2007–) by Toboso Yana (枢やな), and its representation of a Chinese opium den in London's East End, in order to interrogate the possibilities and limitations of the discipline.
Publication Date
7-1-2018
Publication Title
Literature Compass
Volume
15
Issue
7
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.12461
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
85047621528 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85047621528
STARS Citation
Jones, Anna Maria, "Transnational Neo-Victorian Studies: Notes On The Possibilities And Limitations Of A Discipline" (2018). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 8469.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/8469