Sentencing Recommendations By Probation Officers And Judges: An Examination Of Adult Offenders Across Gender
Keywords
courtroom workgroup model; focal concerns; gender; judicial sentencing; probation officer recommendations
Abstract
Connecting the courtroom workgroup model with attributions and stereotyping based on the focal concerns perspective and gender sentencing literature, the present study investigates the extent to which probation officer recommendations influence judicial sentencing, and whether the gender of the offender further conditions this relationship. Results from logistic and ordinary least squares regression indicate that there is concordance between probation officer recommendations and sentencing by judges. Offender gender has both direct and indirect effects on judicial sentencing through its relationship with probation officer recommendations, and Black males tend to receive lengthier sentences than other race/gender counterparts. These findings provide evidence that probation officer recommendations are an important part of the sentencing process and offer additional insight on how extralegal factors such as gender and race impact criminal justice decision making.
Publication Date
3-15-2018
Publication Title
Women and Criminal Justice
Volume
28
Issue
2
Number of Pages
100-124
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2017.1297279
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
85015698901 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85015698901
STARS Citation
Leiber, Michael J.; Beaudry-Cyr, Maude; Peck, Jennifer H.; and Mack, Kristin Y., "Sentencing Recommendations By Probation Officers And Judges: An Examination Of Adult Offenders Across Gender" (2018). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 8494.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/8494