Mortgage Modification And The Decision To Strategically Default: A Game Theoretic Approach
Abstract
While numerous and varied opinions abound, there remains much confusion as to why relatively few mortgages are modified at a time when the demand to modify is historically high. To better understand this complex issue, we build a game theoretic model to quantify a number of economic incentives and costs surrounding critical dimensions of the lender’s decision to modify a loan and the borrower’s decision to strategically default in an attempt to encourage such a modification. We mathematically demonstrate that it is rarely economically rational for lenders to modify loans. For the borrower, we find that their negative equity position, growth rate in home prices, and the probability the lender will exercise its legal right to recourse represent the top three strategic default determinants.
Publication Date
1-1-2015
Publication Title
Journal of Real Estate Research
Volume
37
Issue
3
Number of Pages
439-470
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84969256374 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84969256374
STARS Citation
Collins, Andrew J.; Harrison, David M.; and Seiler, Michael J., "Mortgage Modification And The Decision To Strategically Default: A Game Theoretic Approach" (2015). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 871.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/871