Evaluation And Benefits Of Head-Mounted Display Systems For Hri Research
Abstract
The intent of this evaluation is to describe the unique benefits that may be provided to human robot interaction (HRI) researchers by the capabilities of commercially available binocular head-mounted displays (HMDs) and associated handheld controllers. Three popular HMDs (Oculus Rift, HTC Vive, and Google Daydream) were compared across eight factors: cost, head tracking fidelity, visual resolution, user mobility, hand tracking fidelity, number of input modes, adaptability of input, and provided tracking space. Each of these elements was considered in the context of their relevance to the field of HRI, and potential importance for conducting research in immersive virtual reality (IVR). A Pugh chart was developed to succinctly compare the pros and cons of each headset alongside a description of IVR tasks for HRI military research as well as examples taken from work currently being conducted in our lab.
Publication Date
1-1-2018
Publication Title
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Volume
3
Number of Pages
1484-1488
Document Type
Article; Proceedings Paper
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621336
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
85072757507 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85072757507
STARS Citation
Bendell, Rhyse; Vasquez, Gabrielle; Talone, Andrew B.; and Jentsch, Florian, "Evaluation And Benefits Of Head-Mounted Display Systems For Hri Research" (2018). Scopus Export 2015-2019. 8928.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/8928