Performing Testicular Self-Examination, Driving Automobiles, And Anxiety: What Is The Logical Link?

Keywords

health promotion and disease prevention; preventive medicine; testicular cancer; testicular self-examination

Abstract

The debate of whether testicular self-examination (TSE) should be promoted among males generally centers on a harm–benefit corollary. The benefits of TSE include improving health outcomes, inclusive of an increase in both quality of life and knowledge/awareness of potential health concerns, as well as promoting proactivity in achieving wellness. The harms include claims that false-positive results can increase anxiety and produce costs via unnecessary treatments and therapies. Further claims point to the lack of evidence suggesting TSE decreases testicular cancer mortality. This commentary primarily discusses the anxiety portion of this debate from a logic-based perspective. The argument that TSE should not be promoted among males due to the risk of inciting false-positive anxiety appears to be flawed. A 5-point perspective is presented on the illogical discouragement of TSE due to theorized levels of false-positive anxiety while existing evidence suggests late-stage testicular cancer is associated with anxiety and depression.

Publication Date

5-1-2018

Publication Title

American Journal of Men's Health

Volume

12

Issue

3

Number of Pages

594-596

Document Type

Article

Personal Identifier

scopus

DOI Link

https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988316635048

Socpus ID

85046730908 (Scopus)

Source API URL

https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85046730908

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS