DOI Link
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0047239515588165
Keywords
badges, badging, digital badges, digital badging, gamification, students, university, higher education, learning, education, individual differences, empirical, long-dziuban, reactive behavior, engagement, motivation, learning, nsse
Abstract
Badge use has rapidly expanded in recent years and has benefited a variety of applications. However, a large portion of the research has applied a binary useful or not useful approach to badging. Few studies examine the characteristics of the user and the impact of those characteristics on the effectiveness of the badging system. This study takes preliminary steps toward that cause, examining the effectiveness of a badging system across two web-based university courses in relation to the individual differences of the learners. Individual differences are examined through the lens of Long-Dziuban reactive behavior types and traits. Results revealed differences in badge effectiveness that were dependent upon students’ Long-Dziuban categorization. Student engagement, intrinsic motivation, reflective & integrative learning, and higher order learning were the constructs most dependent upon categorization. Additional results and their implications are discussed within.
Publication Date
6-2015
Document Type
Paper
Language
English
Source Title
Journal of Educational Technology Systems
Volume
43
Issue
4
Copyright Status
Author retained
Publication Version
Post-print
College
College of Arts and Humanities
First Page
403
Last Page
428
Department
Digital Media
ISSN
0047-2395
STARS Citation
Fanfarelli, Joey R. and McDaniel, Thomas Rudy, "Individual Differences in Digital Badging: Do Learner Characteristics Matter?" (2015). Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works. 108.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/ucfscholar/108
Included in
Adult and Continuing Education Commons, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Educational Psychology Commons, Game Design Commons, Instructional Media Design Commons, Online and Distance Education Commons, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Commons