The Role of Self-Service Technologies in Restoring Justice
Keywords
self-service technology, justice, resource exchange theory
Abstract
As an increasing number of customers choose to interact with service firms via technology, there is an urgent need to understand whether consumers react differently to technology-based failures/recovery efforts than human failures/recovery efforts. Using resource exchange theory as a framework, the present investigation examined the role of failure mode (SST vs. face-to-face encounter) and recovery mode on customers' fairness perceptions. Results from Study 1 suggest that compensation offered by a front-line employee might be more effective in restoring justice with traditional failures (match condition) than with SST failures (mismatch condition). Findings from Study 2 further support the matching hypothesis in terms of distributive justice. On the other hand, human touch seems more effective in restoring interactional fairness than on-line recovery. The follow-up study extends the matching hypothesis to satisfaction with problem handling and repurchase intent. Managerial implications of these findings are discussed.
Publication Date
3-10-2010
Original Citation
Mattila, Anna S., Cho, Wonae, and Ro, Heejung. (2011). The role of self-service technology in restoring justice. Journal of Business Research. 64 (4), 348-355.
Number of Pages
348-355
Document Type
Paper
Language
English
Source Title
Journal of Business Research
Volume
64
Issue
11
Copyright Status
Unknown
Copyright Date
2011
College
Rosen College of Hospitality Management
Location
Rosen College of Hospitality Management
STARS Citation
Mattila, Anna S.; Cho, Wonae; and Ro, Heejung, "The Role of Self-Service Technologies in Restoring Justice" (2010). Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works. 536.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/ucfscholar/536