Keywords

complexity theory; ecofeminism; conservation and invasion biology; ecology; coyotes; red wolves

Abstract

Conservation biology and invasion biology are value-led scientific disciplines founded on environmental advocacy, operating at the intersection of research and action. Though these disciplines are known for their scientific veracity, unexamined values are often promulgated without scrutiny and drive decisions that work against good ecological outcomes. A case in point is that coyotes migrating into southeastern territory are framed as the greatest threat to the conservation of the endangered red wolf because hybridization is seen as diminishing their species integrity. Applying Val Plumwood’s ecofeminist account of dualistic frameworks, I will use this case to show how the vilification of the coyote and the sanctification of the red wolf lean on constructions of moral binaries that distort ecological relations and imply that nature is something to be subjugated, managed, interpreted, and controlled for our desired outcomes. As a solution to dualized and reductionist thinking, I suggest a robust inclusion of the principles of complexity theory would dismantle latent values for species purity and mastery of nature that work against evolutionary adaptability and human-ecological relations. A transition away from dualized, reductionist thinking and towards adopting an interdisciplinary and interspecies ethics modeled after complexity theory would allow biologists and wildlife managers to embrace hybridization between coyotes and red wolves as a creative process of a greater ecological system that is complex, inherently unpredictable, irreducible, and untamable.

Thesis Completion Year

2026

Thesis Completion Semester

Summer

Thesis Chair

Rudow, Brooke

College

College of Community Innovation and Education

Department

Department of Philosophy

Thesis Discipline

Philosophy

Language

English

Access Status

Open Access

Length of Campus Access

None

Campus Location

Orlando (Main) Campus

Share

COinS
 

Accessibility Statement

This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.

Rights Statement

In Copyright