Keywords
Originalism, Racial Framing, Civil Rights, Sociology
Abstract
Originalism is a legal framework of constitutional interpretation that re-emerged in the United States in the 1970's as part of the conservative legal movement. In the decades since, originalism has grown in prominence both in government institutions and interest groups. Using critical discourse analysis, this research identifies the frames and narratives developed in originalism and examines how those frames and narratives are used by network members in friend of the Court briefs in Shelby County v. Eric Holder 2013 and Students for Fair Admissions v. Regents of Harvard University 2022. This research finds three dominant frames in the originalist literature and demonstrates how these frames are deployed in amicus brief in support of the petitioners in each of the two cases. This research provides a sociological perspective on the use of originalism and how it is used to reverse civil rights gains.
Completion Date
2023
Semester
Fall
Committee Chair
Carter, J. Scott
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
College
College of Sciences
Department
Sociology
Format
application/pdf
Identifier
DP0028063
URL
https://purls.library.ucf.edu/go/DP0028063
Language
English
Release Date
December 2024
Length of Campus-only Access
1 year
Access Status
Doctoral Dissertation (Campus-only Access)
Campus Location
Orlando (Main) Campus
STARS Citation
Mathews, Adrienne, "Originalist Framing in Two Civil Rights Cases" (2023). Graduate Thesis and Dissertation 2023-2024. 70.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd2023/70
Restricted to the UCF community until December 2024; it will then be open access.