Keywords

rhetoric, artificial memory, rhetorical anthropology, renaissance, memory palace, kairos

Abstract

In 16th century Europe the nearly 2000-year-old discipline of rhetoric, still a pillar of education, underwent significant change. One of the more curious changes occurred in rhetoric’s subdivision known as memory, memoria, that is, memory’s “artificial” cultivation. During the 16th century rhetorical memory was paradoxically both maximized and marginalized as a discipline. And by the early 17th century memoria was all but extinct as a branch of rhetoric. The causal mechanisms of this transformation remain underexamined, particularly by rhetoric and composition scholars, and most explanations remain unclear and uncompelling. Accordingly, this thesis attempts a new approach to rhetorical memory’s puzzling obsolescence. Still adhering to traditional historiographic methods, other, non-traditional, markedly rhetorical techniques are employed. Rhetorical terms such as kairos, topoi and “rhetorical situation” are layered into and substituted for conventional, less-interrogated paradigms and ideas, such as chronology, education, the Reformation, and so on. By adjusting the metaphorical substructures and traditional heuristics of conventional analysis, new perspectives on this important chapter in the history of rhetoric and education are achieved.

Completion Date

2025

Semester

Summer

Committee Chair

Melody Bowdon

Degree

Master of Arts (M.A.)

College

College of Arts and Humanities

Department

Rhetoric and Writing

Format

PDF

Identifier

DP0029587

Language

English

Document Type

Thesis

Campus Location

Orlando (Main) Campus

Download

Share

COinS