When Do Fair Procedures Not Matter? A Test of the Identity Violation Effect

    Authors

    D. M. Mayer; R. L. Greenbaum; M. Kuenzi;G. Shteynberg

    Comments

    Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at STARS@ucf.edu

    Abstract

    Considerable research has demonstrated that fair procedures help improve reactions to decisions, a phenomenon known as the fair process effect. However, in the present research, the authors identify when and why objectively fair procedures (i.e., receiving voice) may not always improve justice perceptions. Findings from 2 studies (Ns = 108 and 277) yield support for the proposed identify violation effect, which posits that when an outcome violates a central aspect of one's self (i.e., personal and/or social identity), objectively fair procedures do not improve procedural and distributive justice perceptions. Further, consistent with the motivated reasoning hypothesis, the Voice X Identity Violation interaction on justice perceptions, was mediated by participants' tendency to find a procedural flaw-namely, to doubt that opinions were considered before making the decision.

    Journal Title

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    Volume

    94

    Issue/Number

    1

    Publication Date

    1-1-2009

    Document Type

    Article

    First Page

    142

    Last Page

    161

    WOS Identifier

    WOS:000262740300011

    ISSN

    0021-9010

    Share

    COinS