Interrater reliability in job analysis: Differences in strategy and perspective

    Authors

    K. O. Prien; E. P. Prien;W. Wooten

    Comments

    Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at STARS@ucf.edu

    Abbreviated Journal Title

    Public Personnel Manage.

    Keywords

    ANALYSIS QUESTIONNAIRE; TASK RATINGS; INFORMATION; INCUMBENTS; ADOPTION; SCALES; BIAS; Industrial Relations & Labor; Public Administration

    Abstract

    In spite of the increasing use of the content validity model for employee selection, there has been little focused research on the psychometric properties of the job analysis ratings used to determine job content. Sources of systematic variance include differences in job performance strategies and differences in perspectives on the job. In the current study, task importance ratings for a single job (social worker) are examined to determine whether rater experience and race will have significant effects on job performance strategy and job perspectives, as measured by job analysis ratings.

    Journal Title

    Public Personnel Management

    Volume

    32

    Issue/Number

    1

    Publication Date

    1-1-2003

    Document Type

    Article

    Language

    English

    First Page

    125

    Last Page

    141

    WOS Identifier

    WOS:000182903500007

    ISSN

    0091-0260

    Share

    COinS