Electoral Support for Community Growth Management Policy

Authors

    Authors

    C. Hawkins

    Comments

    Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at [email protected]

    Abbreviated Journal Title

    Soc. Sci. Q.

    Keywords

    LAND-USE REGULATION; BALLOT MEASURES; IMPACT FEES; OPEN SPACES; DETERMINANTS; CONSTRUCTION; POLITICS; MACHINE; Political Science; Sociology

    Abstract

    Objectives This study seeks to explain the variation in voter support for growth management policy. Interest group theory of local politics and property rights is used as a theoretical framework to explore how competing pro-growth and anti-growth interests influence the level of electoral support at the ballot box. Methods Survey data collected from local planning officials in Massachusetts are analyzed using a two-stage Heckman selection model. Results The results indicate that development competition has a negative effect and controversy over development a positive effect on the probability of a community placing growth management policy on the local ballot. The analysis further indicates that environmental interests and suburban communities have a positive influence on the percentage of votes cast in favor of conservation-oriented growth management policy. Neighborhood-based interests, on the other hand, have a negative influence on voter support. Conclusions The findings suggest that compared to the normal legislative process, ballot-box voting allows anti-growth and localized interests the opportunity to craft proposals and then mobilize support for policy changes.

    Journal Title

    Social Science Quarterly

    Volume

    92

    Issue/Number

    1

    Publication Date

    1-1-2011

    Document Type

    Article

    Language

    English

    First Page

    268

    Last Page

    284

    WOS Identifier

    WOS:000286942300014

    ISSN

    0038-4941

    Share

    COinS
     

    Accessibility Statement

    This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.