A survey of desalinated permeate post-treatment practices

    Authors

    S. J. Duranceau; R. J. Wilder;S. S. Douglas

    Comments

    Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at [email protected]

    Abbreviated Journal Title

    Desalin. Water Treat.

    Keywords

    Survey; Desalination; Synthetic membrane processes; Post-treatment; Seawater; Brackish water; Disinfection; Degasification; Stabilization; DISTRIBUTION-SYSTEMS; WATER; RELEASE; CORROSION; STATE; LEAD; Engineering, Chemical; Water Resources

    Abstract

    As part of the Water Research Foundation (Denver, CO) project "Post-Treatment Stabilization of Desalinated Water," a questionnaire was developed and distributed to water utilities employing desalination processes to survey post-treatment practices, compile process and water quality data, highlight operating cost and post-treatment operation experiences, and identify distribution system secondary impacts. A total of eighty-three surveys were distributed to water utilities in the United States (USA), Caribbean and Europe, and responses collected over a period of six months duration from the time of initial mailing. Twenty-five questionnaires were returned yielding a thirty percent response rate. Twenty-one of the twenty-five responses were received from the USA, three from Europe and one response was received from the Caribbean. The average-daily permeate flow of the facilities surveyed ranged from 0.39 m(3)/min (0.15 million gallons per day (MGD)) to 184 m(3)/min (70 MGD). Results indicated a variety of methods are employed when post-treating desalinated permeate, with a majority of the surveyed facilities reporting the use of chemical addition using caustic soda (sodium hydroxide) or soda ash (sodium carbonate) for pH adjustment. More than one form of post-treatment was implemented with or without the need for by-pass or native source water blending, and was dependent on source water type. Facilities that relied upon process by-pass for post-treatment stabilization reported blending ratios between 10 and 30%, with an average blending flow rate between 5.26 m(3)/min (2.0 MGD) and 27.6 m(3)/min (10.5 MGD). Blended water alkalinity averaged 150 mg/l as CaCO3, as compared to post-treatment with alkalinity adjustment that approximated 62 mg/l as CaCO3 at the point-of-entry (POE). Primary disinfection was typically accomplished by chlorine addition, although a number of facilities reported using chloramines for secondary disinfection. The reported pH averaged 8.2 units at the POE.

    Journal Title

    Desalination and Water Treatment

    Volume

    37

    Issue/Number

    1-3

    Publication Date

    1-1-2012

    Document Type

    Article

    Language

    English

    First Page

    185

    Last Page

    199

    WOS Identifier

    WOS:000300362900023

    ISSN

    1944-3994

    Share

    COinS
     

    Accessibility Statement

    This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.